SFX by Ex Libris Inc.

1.	PALMER, Michael W. PUTTING THINGS IN EVEN BETTER ORDER - THE ADVANTAGES OF CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE-ANALYSIS. Ecology 74.8 (1993): 2215-2230.
2.	VanDerwarker, Amber M. Integrating zooarchaeology and paleoethnobotany : : Springer New York,, 2010.: 1-333.
3.	Cohen, Y. Statistics and data with R : an applied approach through examples. : Wiley, 2008.: 1-599.
4.	TER BRAAK C J F, CJF F. CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS A NEW EIGENVECTOR TECHNIQUE FOR MULTIVARIATE DIRECT GRADIENT ANALYSIS. Ecology 67.5 (1986): 1167-1179.
5.	Legendre, P. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129.2 (2001): 271-280.
6.	TERBRAAK, C.J.F. F. THE ANALYSIS OF VEGETATION-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONSHIPS BY CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE-ANALYSIS. Vegetatio 69.1-3 (1987): 69-77.
7.	HILL, M. DETRENDED CORRESPONDENCE-ANALYSIS - AN IMPROVED ORDINATION TECHNIQUE. Vegetatio 42.1-3 (1980): 47-58.
8.	Crawley, Michael J. J. The R Book. The R Book. : Wiley, 2007.: 1-942.
9.	Rousseau, Guillaume X. Multivariate effects of plant canopy, soil physico-chemistry and microbiology on Sclerotinia stem rot of soybean in relation to crop rotation and urban compost amendment. Soil biology & biochemistry 38.12 (2006): 3325-3342.
10.	Chamberlain, A. Demography in Archaeology. : Cambridge University Press,, 2006.: 1-235.

Visa fler…

Visa färre…

Multivariate analysis in community ecology [0-521-23820-X; 0-511-62333-X] Gauch, Hugh G.