SFX by Ex Libris Inc.

1.	CATANZARITI, J. Landmark judgment of Independent Contractors Act. Law Society journal 47.6 (2009): 46-47.
2.	Bunting, K. Estoppel by convention and pre-contractual understandings: the position and practical consequences. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 42.3 (2011): 511-536.
3.	Sartor, G. The Italian Google-Case: Privacy, Freedom of Speech and Responsibility of Providers for User-Generated Contents. International journal of law and information technology 18.4 (2010): 356-378.
4.	Barnett, Randy E. E. Squaring undisclosed agency law with contract theory. California law review 75.6 (1988): 1969-2003.
5.	Odling-Smee, L. Dollars and sense. Nature 437.7059 (2005): 614-616.
6.	Taylor, D. Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and their responsibility for content under the new French legal regime. Computer law and security report 20.4 (2004): 268-272.
7.	Possingham, Kerrie P. Biodiversity - Turning up the heat on hotspots. Nature 436.7053 (2005): 919-920.
8.	Burns, Fiona R. R. Giumelli v. Giumelli revisited: equitable estoppel, the constructive trust and discretionary remedialism. The Adelaide law review 22.2 (2001): 123-156.
9.	Wiley, Jonathan A. Two sides of dual agency: evidence from homebuyers and transactions. Journal of property research 30.1 (2013): 47-66.
10.	MüllerFreienfels, W. THE UNDISCLOSED PRINCIPAL*. The modern law review 16.3 (1953): 298-317.

Visa fler…

Visa färre…

Oxford University commonwealth law journal [1472-9342] WATTS, PETER år:2002 vol:2 iss:1 sidor:93 -124