SFX by Ex Libris Inc.

1.	Moilanen, H. Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516.7531 (2014): 383-386.
2.	Sandstrom, C. Institutional Dimensions of Comanagement: Participation, Power, and Process. Society & natural resources 22.3 (2009): 230-244.
3.	Dearden, P. Trends in global protected area governance, 1992–2002. Environmental management 36.1 (2005): 89-100.
4.	Naughton-Treves, L. The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual review of environment and resources 30.1 (2005): 219-252.
5.	Fuller, McDonald-Madden A. Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes. Nature 466.7304 (2010): 365-367.
6.	Schmidt, Vivien A. Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European political science review 2.01 (2010): 1-25.
7.	Watson, James E. M., James E M E. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515.7525 (2014): 67-73.
8.	Venter, O. Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity. PLoS Biology 12.6 (2014).
9.	Oldekop, J. A. A. A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conservation biology 30.1 (2015): 133-141.
10.	Griffiths, R. Captive breeding, reintroduction, and the conservation of amphibians. Conservation biology 22.4 (2008): 852-861.

Visa fler…

Visa färre…

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B - Biological Sciences [0962-8436] Pressey, Robert år:2015 vol:370 iss:1681 sidor:20140280 -20140280